So the experiments done by scientists on animals are rarely effective. A utilitarian consideration may help justify the use of animals in biomedical research. Animals feel pain and fear just as we do. Thus, there are strong, moral arguments against animal-testing. In fact, use of animals in research has been important in the acquisition of medical knowledge such as understanding fundamental processes in human body and generally improving the quality of health of human beings as well as animals.
Where there are reliable alternatives in scientific research, animals are not used. On the other hand, removing animals completely from the lab would impede our understanding of health and disease, and consequently affect the development of new and vital treatments.
Had the drug been tested on animals, its toxicity would be observed, and deaths prevented. One of the best examples of this is the earlier space programs carried by NASA. Justifying Animal Use in Scientific Research The use of animals in scientific research especially biomedical testing is still a controversial issue despite the benefits realized from it and the lives saved from the same.
Researchers working with animals carry out their experiments with extreme care to eliminate or minimise suffering. Facing the Challenge of Animal Rights.
Nonetheless, this does not disqualify animals as not having a moral status. The harm done to human beings by not experimenting on animals is unknown, whereas the harm done to animals if they are tested on is certain.
They have the ability to accumulate and store large amounts of knowledge in a perpetual form, which can be used to secure benefits for next generations.
Diethylene glycol is toxic unless treated, and patients died Wax, This page was last updated on Related Content: Although there are many controversies surrounding the issue of using animals in scientific research, it is still an inevitable part of biomedical research.
A human being cannot make a claim on a dog or lion that attacked him or her because the dog does not recognize the interests of human beings.
Another basic argument of animal rights defenders is that people and animals are different genetically and therefore it is useless to use animals in experiments to see the effects of some substances on people. Click on one of the links below for resources on the specific area of interest surrounding the issue of animal testing: Getting critique on your writing is like getting critique on your photos: Yes Scientists have been able to advance their knowledge of human and animal health and disease dramatically by studying model organisms.
However, strict legislation is implemented in many countries. The probability of using one experiment to heal severe diseases and advance our knowledge is very high. However, these people cannot foresee the disastrous results of such a practice. This is around times more animals than the number used in scientific research.
Yes The use of animals in research is essential for enabling researchers to develop new drugs and treatments. Your summary is focused on animal rights activists adopting a new view; yet your opening is about how science is progressive with animal testing.
Yes The UK has gone further than any other country to implement thorough ethical frameworks when it comes to animals in research. Polio-research has clearly benefitted humans massively, which animal-testing has helped achieve.
One example of this is the polio-vaccine.Argument Essay: ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION. There has been a controversy between animal rights supporters and scientists about whether it is right to use animals in experimental research.
- Animal research, or animal testing, is the use of animals in scientific researches to study and develop drugs for the life-taking diseases that human beings contract.
It has been practiced for hundreds of years. A poll of 3, scientists by the Pew Research Center found that 89% favored the use of animals in scientific research. [ ] The American Cancer Society, American Physiological Society, National Association for Biomedical Research, American Heart Association, and the Society of Toxicology all advocate the use of animals in scientific research.
Jun 04, · But what are the benefits from using animals for scientific researches? Firstly, different research institutions in the world say that with the help of such experiments, there is still live of Earth.
Just recall the testing with dogs which led to the discovering of insulin/5(21). Should Animals be Used for Scientific Research?
Essay. millions of animals experience painful, suffering and death due to results of scientific research as the effects of drugs, medical procedures, food additives, cosmetics and other chemical products. Animal research essay resources Many students, from primary school to university, write assignments that relate to the issue of animal research.
This page aims to support this by providing links to .Download